Thursday, February 26, 2009
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
My American Dream
In my first post before I left, I hated on Hollywood. Like many, I was disturbed by its plastic fakeness and its ability to distort our perception of reality. In some ways, I still feel that way. I also hated on my college for spending so much money on a trip to cover such a blase event when more significant happenings were occurring in the world around us, and I still do not think that this mainstream-movie lovefest is really all that special.
And yet I have to admit that it made me think about my reality in terms of our American identity in a global culture striving for something more than war or famine. In America, our reality is not only one in which an event like the Academy Awards can happen, but also one that can empower a small group of college students to experience, explore, and create- which is exactly what we did on this trip.
Stay posted for media from our adventure!
Sunday, February 22, 2009
1969
I finally caved in today, and I was surprised to find that it is actually a 1st amendment rights protest by a a billboard artist named Michael McNeilly relating to Los Angeles' new billboard regulations.
The L.A. Times wrote this about the controversy:
Art and commerce aren't incompatible, but in McNeilly's case they're indistinguishable; as L.A. officials try to enforce a moratorium on billboards, he's pulling his Statue of Liberty stunt on other buildings, daring the city to engage in another losing 1st Amendment battle. If the patriotic images should be replaced with movie ads after the legal dust has settled -- well, an artist's got a right to make a living, right?
I think it's related to why we call them "stars" in the first place, associating them to the celestial bodies that can be seen from a distance but never touch. In both referents of the word "star," we feel their presence but we can never really experience them close up; they emanate light (through our screens or from the sky) and we easily forget that they physically exist at all.
And yet when you finally see them walking in front of you in real life, it almost feels like a let-down. They aren't the shining bodies that we somehow wish they were. They are just like us. And we desire more than what's just like us, perhaps because media and advertisement frames is that way, or maybe just because we enjoy creating fictions around our lives. Yet when you see an ET reporter's smiling face drop to a grumpy frown after he completes a take, you see the illusion that screens can project.
I definitely do not think this illusion is always bad thing, I just think we should keep it in mind.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
"Reality" TV: We're All In It Together
The other day, Henry Winkler talked a lot about being in "show biz," but one thing that really stuck out in my mind were his ideas about the entertainment industry using media purely for financial gain.
In today's television world, the only reason shows exist is because of advertising- networks sell you and I, as viewers, to companies. Effectively, we are the commodities that AOL/ Time Warner, Viacom, Walt Disney, Sony, etc. are selling to companies, and the content they produce is just a gimmick to get us watching.
I don't necessarily think this is a bad system. After all, in a capitalist economy we need money to do things, and the things that these companies profit from make most people happy. However, Mr. Winkler and I agree that what the media industry and we as a culture need to get into our heads is that money is only a means to an end- not at all an end in itself. When monetary wealth dictates things we do and happiness translates into getting the items we want, our minds go screwy and we want more and more and care less and less about each other and the "real" world around us. It's like a drug that we all desire in some weird way, and it's extra hard to ignore in such a luxurious city like L.A. where it's easy to get caught up in the glitz and glam of Hollywood nightlife.
In some ways, I think that the financial fiasco we are in right now (which almost all of our interviewees have mentioned) isn't such a bad thing. This shrinkage of wealth in the world, a growing global conscience about the environment, and the rise of two-way media on the internet is forcing us to look closer at ourselves and allowing us to express what we find in more ways than ever. Once a majority of the global population really gets this, we will tip into a new found global and personal benevolence and refresh our humanity.
Who needs reality shows when the theatrics of real life are just as satisfying?
And also, Henry Winkler is a great guy.
I don't necessarily think this is a bad system. After all, in a capitalist economy we need money to do things, and the things that these companies profit from make most people happy. However, Mr. Winkler and I agree that what the media industry and we as a culture need to get into our heads is that money is only a means to an end- not at all an end in itself. When monetary wealth dictates things we do and happiness translates into getting the items we want, our minds go screwy and we want more and more and care less and less about each other and the "real" world around us. It's like a drug that we all desire in some weird way, and it's extra hard to ignore in such a luxurious city like L.A. where it's easy to get caught up in the glitz and glam of Hollywood nightlife.
In some ways, I think that the financial fiasco we are in right now (which almost all of our interviewees have mentioned) isn't such a bad thing. This shrinkage of wealth in the world, a growing global conscience about the environment, and the rise of two-way media on the internet is forcing us to look closer at ourselves and allowing us to express what we find in more ways than ever. Once a majority of the global population really gets this, we will tip into a new found global and personal benevolence and refresh our humanity.
Who needs reality shows when the theatrics of real life are just as satisfying?
And also, Henry Winkler is a great guy.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Ammunition
I always knew that cameras had a lot of power in today's society, but I guess I didn't realize quite how much until I cam here to L.A.
Every time our crew walks into the red carpet area, or near the ballroom, the media escorts and security guards scrutinize our credentials and camera gear with squinted eyes. They remind us over and over again that we CANNOT take still pictures. Then they huddle together and whisper about us as if we were carrying sub machine guns and grenade belts, and they're not sure if they want to let us into "the club."
I guess without scripts and executives, cameras are, in a way, mightier than the sword (or gun) because they do have the ability to capture things that the spoken word simply cannot recreate.
I guess without scripts and executives, cameras are, in a way, mightier than the sword (or gun) because they do have the ability to capture things that the spoken word simply cannot recreate.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Hollywood Necromance
On our walk, I spotted a folded chalk sign that had a coffee cup drawing on it, which meant breakfast was nearby. The owner, Yaron, was a sweet L.A. local who made us feel welcome in his shop and cooked a killer omelet.
It turns out, an obscure jewelry shop that Cat was looking for, Necromance, was right next door. The store was closed, but, according to Yaron, they sell jewelry and artifacts that are made completely from deceased animals including a human molar necklace charm and decorative monkey skulls. "Everything in there is totally real," he said, "it's freaky."
I found this immensely interesting: among all the studios and extravagant sets that try so hard to extend beyond "reality," there was a tiny boutique that was so real it made Yaron, an L.A. resident of 28 years, shutter. "I only went because the owners told me they just got a lion tail in and my horoscope is Leo. Otherwise, I would never go there, I can't even do hospitals."
I mean, it doesn’t even snow in this city!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)